← Sportsbooks
Visit sportsbook ↗
DuckDice
TRUST SCORE
7.0/10
Above average
Arbitrage betting not allowed
DuckDice's Terms include a general "unfair advantage"/abusive-pattern clause under which an account can be restricted and funds withheld, though the Terms don't name arbitrage or surebetting explicitly. Notably, DuckDice's Terms name the same operating entity — Zentari Limitada (Costa Rica) — as Tower.bet's, suggesting the two run on shared back-office infrastructure.
Long-running operator (2016 launch) with a large, active player base and provably-fair dice focus
← Back to all complaints
Community report
Community report — not independently verified
Sportsbook winnings seized over suspected arbitrage/systematic-exploitation flag
Sportsbook
Winnings confiscated / forfeited
Priority B — funds frozen / prolonged review
What happened
A recent AskGamblers review describes the operator flagging an account for suspected arbitrage/systematic exploitation; the player said the original deposit was returned but the profits were seized, and requested bet-level evidence that the review doesn't show being provided. This is drawn from the review's narrative rather than a specific, individually adjudicated complaint case, so it's treated with more caution than this database's typical complaint entries pending the underlying case being located.
Amount at stake
Not stated
Operator's stated reason
"Suspected arbitrage/systematic exploitation, per the operator's flagging as described in the review"
Status
Community report — This case was closed without a clear resolution either way.