← Sportsbooks

Rainbet

Crypto sportsbook Anjouan
Checking your country…
KYC conditional
"Conditional" means no KYC is required just to sign up and play. Verification is only requested in some cases — most commonly when withdrawing, or if suspicious activity is flagged.
 ⚠ 10 complaints
TRUST SCORE
8.3/10
Trusted
Visit sportsbook ↗
72-hour KYC deadline, easy to miss
AskGamblers logs an unresolved complaint where a player says Rainbet left a Level 4 KYC request in support chat with only a 72-hour deadline attached; by the time they saw the message the window had already passed, and the account was reportedly closed with over EUR 3,000 inside despite the player submitting identity, address and source-of-funds documents afterward. Several other Rainbet complaints (AskGamblers, Trustpilot, Bitcointalk) independently describe a similar shape: deposit/bet, request a withdrawal, get hit with an enhanced KYC or "bets under review" hold, then a prolonged block or closure.
Arbitrage bets may be voided — account safe
Rainbet may void or cancel bets identified as arbitrage, but does not restrict or close the account as a result.
Withdrawals processed in 5-15 minutes
Generous rakeback
Sportsbook powered by BetBy
← Back to all complaints
Unresolved Community report — not independently verified

$350 complaint

Account Withdrawal / balance dispute Priority C — sportsbook issue
What happened
Listed in Bitcointalk’s maintained scam-accusation tracker for Rainbet: “$350 complaint”, with a disputed amount listed as USD 350. The tracker records this case’s status as “In progress”. This entry reflects the tracker’s summary description, not a full reading of the underlying thread — the linked source should be checked directly before being treated as an adjudicated fact.
Amount at stake
USD 350
Status
Unresolved — From the player's account, this has not been made right.
Source: Bitcointalk  ·  Original complaint ↗
Key information
Category
Account
Issue type
Withdrawal / balance dispute
Amount
USD 350
Status
Unresolved
Source
Bitcointalk (unverified)
How we source this

Cases here come from operator-facing complaint platforms (AskGamblers, Casino Guru) and public forum/Reddit reports. A verified case went through that platform's own review process; an unverified one is a community report we haven't independently confirmed. Visitors can also file a complaint directly (see below) — those go through our own review before publishing, kept separate from this sourced set. See How scoring works for the full methodology.