← Sportsbooks

Rainbet

Crypto sportsbook Anjouan
Checking your country…
KYC conditional
"Conditional" means no KYC is required just to sign up and play. Verification is only requested in some cases — most commonly when withdrawing, or if suspicious activity is flagged.
 ⚠ 6 complaints
TRUST SCORE
8.5/10
Trusted
Visit sportsbook ↗
72-hour KYC deadline, easy to miss
AskGamblers logs an unresolved complaint where a player says Rainbet left a Level 4 KYC request in support chat with only a 72-hour deadline attached; by the time they saw the message the window had already passed, and the account was reportedly closed with over EUR 3,000 inside despite the player submitting identity, address and source-of-funds documents afterward. Several other Rainbet complaints (AskGamblers, Trustpilot, Bitcointalk) independently describe a similar shape: deposit/bet, request a withdrawal, get hit with an enhanced KYC or "bets under review" hold, then a prolonged block or closure.
Arbitrage bets may be voided — account safe
Rainbet may void or cancel bets identified as arbitrage, but does not restrict or close the account as a result.
Withdrawals processed in 5-15 minutes
Generous rakeback
Sportsbook powered by BetBy
← Back to all complaints
Resolved

$6,057 value-betting dispute (2024), later resolved

Sportsbook Sportsbook value-betting dispute Priority B — funds frozen / prolonged review
What happened
A 2024 Bitcointalk thread describes a roughly $6,057 dispute involving an allegation about value betting — relevant to the line between limiting sharp bettors and voiding/withholding already-accepted winnings. The thread was ultimately marked resolved, so it's kept here as historical evidence of a dispute rather than a currently unpaid complaint.
Amount at stake
$6,057
Operator's stated reason
"Not stated in the indexed source"
Status
Resolved — This case reached a resolution.
Source: Bitcointalk  ·  Original complaint ↗
Key information
Category
Sportsbook
Issue type
Sportsbook value-betting dispute
Amount
$6,057
Status
Resolved
Source
Bitcointalk
How we source this

Cases here come from operator-facing complaint platforms (AskGamblers, Casino Guru) and public forum/Reddit reports. A verified case went through that platform's own review process; an unverified one is a community report we haven't independently confirmed. Visitors can also file a complaint directly (see below) — those go through our own review before publishing, kept separate from this sourced set. See How scoring works for the full methodology.