← Sportsbooks

Rollbit

Crypto sportsbook Curaçao
Checking your country…
KYC conditional
"Conditional" means no KYC is required just to sign up and play. Verification is only requested in some cases — most commonly when withdrawing, or if suspicious activity is flagged.
⚠ 13 complaints
TRUST SCORE
4.6/10
Below average
Visit sportsbook ↗
Arbitrage betting not allowed
Rollbit's Sports Policy (rollbit.com/sports-policy) is JavaScript-rendered and could not be independently retrieved by an automated fetch, so no verbatim clause is quoted here. Rollbit's sportsbook runs on the same BetBy white-label platform as SolCasino.io, BetFury, Cryptorino, Winna, Betpanda and Rakebit, all six of which carry a near-identical "arbitrage strategy... strictly prohibited" clause at the same Section 7.4.4 of the shared template — flagged for Rollbit on that pattern-match basis, not from independently reading Rollbit's own copy of the text.
Payout & support complaints reported
Casino.Guru rates Rollbit 4.1/10 (“Low”) on its Safety Index and has logged 110 player complaints against it (44 unresolved, 14 resolved, 50 rejected, 2 open), describing a “no reaction policy” toward its complaint-mediation process. One tracked case: a player with completed KYC and a prior clean withdrawal history had a $700 balance confiscated over an unspecified “Terms and Conditions” violation, and Rollbit stopped responding to follow-ups. A separate, dated AskGamblers forum case (Feb 2026, open) describes a player who had already completed KYC having $907 frozen over vague “linked accounts” concerns, with Rollbit going silent and reportedly blocking the player on social media — the same pattern (restriction or non-payment after KYC, then no response) shows up independently on both platforms.
25+ cryptocurrencies accepted
Sportsbook powered by BetBy
← Back to all complaints
Unresolved

$14,000 in winnings confiscated for alleged betting "abuse"

Casino Winnings confiscated / forfeited Priority A — confiscation / forfeiture
What happened
Player alleged winnings were confiscated over betting techniques said to circumvent the house edge. Casino Guru closed the case unresolved after no satisfactory outcome was reached.
Amount at stake
14,000 USDT
Operator's stated reason
"Alleged use of betting techniques to circumvent house edge"
Status
Unresolved — From the player's account, this has not been made right.
Source: Casino Guru  ·  Original complaint ↗