← Sportsbooks
Visit sportsbook ↗
Sportbet.one
TRUST SCORE
4.9/10
Below average
Arbitrage betting not allowed
Sportbet.one's Terms could not be independently retrieved in full (the page appears JavaScript-rendered), so no verbatim arbitrage clause could be quoted. Real-world enforcement, however, is well documented: primary-source forum disputes from May 2024 through April 2026 describe the operator's internal "fraud detection" system flagging accounts for suspected arbitrage betting or multi-accounting, with the account restricted and the full balance confiscated rather than only the flagged bets voided — and the operator declining in each case to disclose which specific bets or evidence triggered the decision.
Payout & support complaints reported
A documented bitcointalk.org thread (June-July 2024) describes a player requesting self-exclusion by email on June 30, 2024 for gambling-addiction reasons; the automated self-exclusion system reportedly failed to take effect, and the player lost roughly 2,840 USDT on July 6-7, 2024 during the requested cool-off period. The player alleged inconsistent handling relative to other, reportedly-refunded cases; MISA had not issued a final ruling even after more than a year.
Explicitly stated no-ID-verification policy at any stage, per official FAQ
Casino.Guru Safety Index 9.2/10 and AskGamblers 9.8/10 — among the highest of any operator reviewed here
← Back to all complaints
Community report
Community report — not independently verified
0.02098501 BTC deducted after account review — player admits opening a second account
Sportsbook
Winnings confiscated / forfeited
Priority B — funds frozen / prolonged review
What happened
Player said the withdrawal function was blocked, bets were reviewed, and 0.02098501 BTC was deducted from the balance. Notably, the player admitted opening a second account after losing access to an earlier one, while denying the operator's separate allegations of arbitrage betting and automated software. Because multi-accounting was admitted rather than disputed, this case shouldn't be summarized as a simple wrongful-confiscation allegation — it sits between a legitimate policy enforcement and a disputed over-reach depending on which specific allegation actually drove the deduction.
Amount at stake
0.02098501 BTC
Operator's stated reason
"Multi-accounting (admitted by the player), plus disputed allegations of arbitrage betting and automated software"
Status
Community report — This case was closed without a clear resolution either way.