← Sportsbooks

Sportbet.one

Crypto sportsbook Mwali (Comoros)
Checking your country…
⚠ 5 complaints
TRUST SCORE
4.9/10
Below average
Visit sportsbook ↗
Arbitrage betting not allowed
Sportbet.one's Terms could not be independently retrieved in full (the page appears JavaScript-rendered), so no verbatim arbitrage clause could be quoted. Real-world enforcement, however, is well documented: primary-source forum disputes from May 2024 through April 2026 describe the operator's internal "fraud detection" system flagging accounts for suspected arbitrage betting or multi-accounting, with the account restricted and the full balance confiscated rather than only the flagged bets voided — and the operator declining in each case to disclose which specific bets or evidence triggered the decision.
Payout & support complaints reported
A documented bitcointalk.org thread (June-July 2024) describes a player requesting self-exclusion by email on June 30, 2024 for gambling-addiction reasons; the automated self-exclusion system reportedly failed to take effect, and the player lost roughly 2,840 USDT on July 6-7, 2024 during the requested cool-off period. The player alleged inconsistent handling relative to other, reportedly-refunded cases; MISA had not issued a final ruling even after more than a year.
Explicitly stated no-ID-verification policy at any stage, per official FAQ
Casino.Guru Safety Index 9.2/10 and AskGamblers 9.8/10 — among the highest of any operator reviewed here
← Back to all complaints
Community report Community report — not independently verified

0.006 BTC deducted after bet cancellations attributed to arbitrage; operator responded in its own thread

Sportsbook Winnings confiscated / forfeited Priority B — funds frozen / prolonged review
What happened
Player reported two BTC deposits, with winning bets left under review, later bet cancellations, and a 0.006 BTC deduction attributed to arbitrage betting. Sportbet.one replied publicly in its own announcement thread that it could not identify the account from the forum nickname alone, and asked the player to provide the registered email via support email or PM so the bet-status decisions and deduction could be reviewed. A later forum update reported the explanation remained "activity consistent with arbitrage betting."
Amount at stake
0.006 BTC
Operator's stated reason
"Activity consistent with arbitrage betting, per Sportbet.one's public reply in its own thread"
Status
Community report — This case was closed without a clear resolution either way.
Source: Bitcointalk  ·  Original complaint ↗