← Sportsbooks

Sportbet.one

Crypto sportsbook Mwali (Comoros)
Checking your country…
⚠ 5 complaints
TRUST SCORE
4.9/10
Below average
Visit sportsbook ↗
Arbitrage betting not allowed
Sportbet.one's Terms could not be independently retrieved in full (the page appears JavaScript-rendered), so no verbatim arbitrage clause could be quoted. Real-world enforcement, however, is well documented: primary-source forum disputes from May 2024 through April 2026 describe the operator's internal "fraud detection" system flagging accounts for suspected arbitrage betting or multi-accounting, with the account restricted and the full balance confiscated rather than only the flagged bets voided — and the operator declining in each case to disclose which specific bets or evidence triggered the decision.
Payout & support complaints reported
A documented bitcointalk.org thread (June-July 2024) describes a player requesting self-exclusion by email on June 30, 2024 for gambling-addiction reasons; the automated self-exclusion system reportedly failed to take effect, and the player lost roughly 2,840 USDT on July 6-7, 2024 during the requested cool-off period. The player alleged inconsistent handling relative to other, reportedly-refunded cases; MISA had not issued a final ruling even after more than a year.
Explicitly stated no-ID-verification policy at any stage, per official FAQ
Casino.Guru Safety Index 9.2/10 and AskGamblers 9.8/10 — among the highest of any operator reviewed here
← Back to all complaints
Community report Community report — not independently verified

$612 USDC balance zeroed after a 14-day security review

Sportsbook Winnings confiscated / forfeited Priority B — funds frozen / prolonged review
What happened
Player reported maximum stakes being reduced to zero and being told the account was under a security investigation. The USDC balance was later allegedly reduced to zero. Support reportedly cited arbitrage betting, multi-accounting, or automated betting software as the general basis. The player denied the allegations and said there was no appeal process. No independent adjudication of this specific case was located.
Amount at stake
$612 USDC
Operator's stated reason
"Arbitrage betting, multi-accounting, or automated betting software cited generically by support, per the player's account — the player denied all three"
Status
Community report — This case was closed without a clear resolution either way.
Source: Bitcointalk  ·  Original complaint ↗